Latest Entries »

                                 Let’s face it, this film didn’t stand a chance .

Maybe it’s professional jealousy or personal animosity or a combination of both but Angelina Jolie continues to be a polarizing figure in the entertainment community.

It is not surprising, then, that some folks had the knives out when it was revealed Ms. Jolie was not only going to write and direct her first dramatic feature but serve as one of the producers.  (Oh, the hubris of it all!)

Portrait of the Artist as a Young Filmmaker

Since star-driven vehicles often skid out of control (a San Francisco weekly actually prefaced a negative review by  film critic Karina Longworth with the headline: “An Anti-Movie Star Makes a Vanity Project”) I popped the film into my DVD player expecting the worst.

What I saw instead was  a raw, vivid and emotionally wrenching drama directed with vigor and intelligence by a filmmaker who obviously cares passionately about the subject matter.

And, just to make matters clear, I am not an unabashed fan of Ms. Jolie’s recent body of work. True, her Oscar-winning turn in Girl, Interrupted was a force of nature and, in my opinion, she shoulda won a second Oscar  for her role as real-life heroine Marianne Pearl in 2007′s A Mighty Heart. I also enjoyed her larger-than-life persona in popcorn pics like Salt and WantedHowever, I thought Life or Something Like It and Alexander were unmitigated disasters and The Tourist was every bit as awful as you may have heard. 

Portrait of the Artist as an Action Heroine: Angelina Jolie in “Salt”

The setting for Blood and Honey is the Balkans in the early 1990s. Ajla (Zana Marjanovich), a spirited Bosnian Muslim painter and Danijel (Goran Kopstic), a dashing Serbian cop meet in pre-war Sarajevo.  In the opening scenes we get a glimpse of the strong attraction between the characters. Then the war intervenes and their relationship changes irrevocably. 

Zana Marjanovic & Goran Kostic: In the Land of Blood and Hatred

Ajla is captured by Serbian soldiers and winds up in the prison camp in which Danijel is serving as an officer in the Serbian army.  He tries to help her but all bets are off when he is transferred to another camp.

The film has been dismissed by some critics as little more than, to quote Canadian movie reviewer Jay Stone, “Romeo and Juliet in an internment camp” but for this viewer the characters of Ajla and Danijel help put the conflict into human terms.

Actually, the critics may have been among the few to view the film on the big screen.  The Stateside release was limited to 18 theatres with a combined box office take – according to boxofficemojo.com – of $303, 877. (The budget is rumored to be around $10 million.)

Perhaps at this point, though, Ms. Jolie may care more about making a point than making a potful of money. 

I mean, if she really wanted to make a commercial flick she could have cast herself and longtime paramour Brad Pitt as the star-crossed lovers.  

Instead, she hired two unknown (to American audiences) Balkan actors to play the key roles of  Ajla and Danijel (and shot two versions of the film … including one in Serbo-Croatian with English subtitles.)

Ms. Jolie says she got the idea for the story while touring through the Balkans as a Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations.  ” I was thinking a lot about my ten years traveling into these situations and all the people I met who had gone through conflict and how their lives were affected,” she told USA Today‘s Susan Wloszczyna. “I chose Bosnia because I had been through the area and was very drawn to the region.” 

Although the film fared poorly at the American box office it was a hit at a (relatively new) film festival in Sarajevo where Ms. Jolie received an award … and a standing ovation.  Judging from a report filed by BBC News correspondent Alan Little that was the audience that really counted.

Angelina Jolie Accepts Honorary Award at Sarajevo Film Festival

“It was one of the most amazing nights of my life, to be a part of that,” she told Little. “You take people’s stories, their histories and you try to do your best by them but you’re not making a documentary; it’s an artistic interpretation, a film … and you see these people sitting here, reliving the worst parts of their lives and you think, Are they going to embrace it, or are they going to get upset? And when they stood I thought I was going to cry.”

“The dialogue was so authentic,”  Ms. Marjanovic told USA Today. “When I spoke to Angelina on the phone, the first thing I asked was whether she did it. I said, ‘No matter what happens after this, I want to say congratulations and thank you as a Bosnian for the script.’ “

The fledgling filmmaker also earned praise from veteran actor/filmmaker Clint Eastwood, who directed Ms. Jolie in The Changeling: “I think it’s a tough movie and that it’s extremely well made, and tough movies that are extremely well made are very hard to do.”

“In the Land of Blood and Honey is not an easy film to watch,” warns Little. “It depicts, in bleak and chilling detail, the brutal process by which hundreds of thousands of non-Serbs were removed from their homes in the campaign that came to be known as ethnic cleansing. Civilians are casually gunned down in the street; women are repeatedly raped.” 

(Yes, the film contains nudity and shocking violence. However, in the opinion of this viewer the scenes of brutality have been added to hammer home a point and the nudity is never gratuitous, an offshoot, perhaps, of having a woman behind the camera.)

“Go to the Serbian half of the country and you enter a parallel universe,” reports Little. “Here, atrocities committed in the name of the Serb nation, aimed at carving out an ethnically pure Serb territory in Bosnia, are routinely denied.”

 Dragan Mutapdzija is a Serb veteran of the 1992-95 conflict and an inmate in a war-time prison camp for several months.

“Serbs never deny that crimes were committed,” he told Little. “But they were committed by individuals and not by the whole nation. This film demonizes our nation. Yet again the Serbs are depicted as the bad guys.”

 So does the film lack balance? “The war was not balanced,” Little quotes Jolie as saying. “I can’t understand people who are looking for a balance that did not exist. There are some people who don’t want to be reminded of these things, some even who deny that these things even happened. Those people are going to be angry.”

Kostic agrees. “It is very difficult, I suppose, to be unbiased and not to offend anybody so whatever you write, someone is going to be unhappy,” he is quoted as saying on lasplash.com.  “For me it was important to get the female point of view.   I can’t judge if someone else would have done it better or differently.  She is the one who decided to do it and she did a great job.”

Rade Šerbedžija plays Serbian commander Nebojša Vukojević

Rade Šerbedžija represents the Serbian side of the equation. As depicted in the film his character is a remorseless killer seeking revenge for the murder of members of his family by Bosnian forces.

Ms. Jolie says one of the aims of the film was to create an awareness of the war.

“The choice to make a film about this area and set in this time in history was also to remind people of what happened not so long ago …” she is quoted as saying on IBTIMES.com

If that is true, she has already achieved that aim with this viewer. Because, after this film I wanted to know more about the war that the West has forgotten (and never knew that much about in the first place.) 

As in most wars, there are two sides to the story. For a viewpoint not included in the film click on the link below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lMobCjvh10






It was a rainy Monday night and I was looking for something suitably  brainless to take my mind off the weather. (That’s my excuse and I’m sticking to it.)  

Mark Wahlberg does his lock and load duty as a retired smuggler who decides to pull one last job to get his wife’s kid brother out of a jam (and if your wife looked like Kate Beckinsale you would, too.)

While Dad is at sea and heading for Panama his wife and kids are being menaced by a greasy tattooed thug (Giovanni Ribisi.)

Ben Foster also figures in the mix and if you’ve seen his mug in movies like 3:10 to Yuma and The Mechanic you just know that can`t be good.

Yeah, that guy!

So, anyway, in the DVD extras, I see the movie is based on a 2008  Icelandic thriller called Reykjavik-Rotterdam. 

And wouldn`t ya know it?  Next time I am in the video shop  I see one copy of the original is new on the shelves.  And unlike most English language remakes of foreign films these two flicks have something in common besides a semblance of the plot.

Turns out Baltasar Kormakur, the director of the English language remake, is the star of the original Icelandic movie.

Baltasar Kormakur: Iceland`s Hottest Export since Bjork?

The original even shares a common cast member. Bilingual actor Ólafur Darri Ólafsson appears in a small role in both films.

Granted, Kormakur lacks Wahlberg`s hustle and muscle as a believable action hero. (And, as a director, he demonstrates some impressive action chops in his lensing of a kinetic set piece in which Wahlberg`s character gets mixed up in a Panamanian armored car heist.)

So yeah, Contraband works for me as a competent action thriller (and it did take my mind off the rain for a couple of hours.)

And although Ribisi is shorter in stature he is way more menacing than the thug in the original movie.

Giovanni Ribisi in Contraband

No one plays a psychotic loose cannon like Ribisi.  (Actually, he is a scary little dude in anything he is in. I mean, he gave me the creeps in Lost in Translation and he wasn`t even playing a bad guy in that one.)

However, I can see an able-bodied American made action thriller anytime. The shelves of my local video store are littered with them.

But how many times do I get a chance to see a genuine, made -in-Iceland crime thriller

So, yeah, if you`re looking for an action-packed Hollywood timewaster Contraband will fill the bill.

But rent the original first. To me, that is truly exotic film fare.

PS Kormakur and Wahlberg must have bonded on Contraband because Marky Mark is already working with the Icelandic director on a new action thriller, tentatively titled 2 Guns, with Denzel Washington, no less.




No, not these Avengers – that was a (fondly remembered) UK TV series

Marvel’s The Avengers topped the worldwide box office for the third week in a row and scored a 93 % approval rating on rottentomatoes.com (247 positive reviews, 18 negative) so I am obviously in the minority here but this megabuck production which collects  some of the fabled comic franchise’s biggest superheroes and plops them into one movie left me strangely, um, underwhelmed.

“Underwhelmed? WTF does that even mean?”

Having said that, I realize I have placed myself directly in the path of a rabid fanboy army and a bunch of formerly respected film critics desperate to sell their soul to remain hip and relevant in the New World Order.

To make matters worse, I can’t even put my cursor on what it is about the movie that didn’t click with me.

I mean, I’ve been reading Marvel Comics since I was kneehigh to a newsstand ….

Frankly, I liked the books better

and although I am not a card-carrying Joss Whedon fan (he co-wrote and directed the movie) everything he has been involved with (that I’ve seen) worked for me (shucks, I even watched Dollhouse and was pissed when they pinkslipped it after less than two seasons).

In terms of casting well, Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Robert Downey Jr. (Iron Man), Mark Ruffalo (Hulk) and Jeremy Renner  (Hawkeye) are on an (admittedly short) list of contemporary actors I admire and as for Scarlett Johansson in a form-fitting catsuit, well, be still, my foolish heart (I think I spelled that right.)

Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow: Knock ‘Em Dead Redhead

So what is it about this movie that made me feel as if  … to borrow a popular fanboy phrase … that’s two hours and twenty minutes of my life that I can’t get back? 

Well, maybe it’s the paperthin plot or maybe there was just too many CGI-saturated battle scenes.

Whatever. By the time the skies opened up over the Big Apple and an alien army started trashing Manhattan I was too shellshocked to finish my popcorn.

Yes, I’ve got the album with the Andy Warhol designed cover (and tracks like “Femme Fatale”, “Venus in Furs” and “All Tomorrow’s Parties”, to name a few future classics.)

but it was  Loaded that really captured my imagination.

Maybe it was the setting. I first heard the album at my cousin’s place. He was still living with his first wife. She had actually seen the group at Max’s Kansas City and other venues in NYC and through her the music came alive. Suddenly they were not just another band I heard on college radio. I felt a personal connection with the group.

I was already a big Bowie fan.  I loved those LPs Dave and Iggy made in Berlin. Listening to iconic tracks like “Sweet Jane”, “I Found a Reason”, “Rock’n'Roll”, “New Age” and “Who Loves The Sun” (the Velvets’ wry reply to the Sixties optimism of the Beatles’ “Here Comes the Sun”)  was like discovering the Rosetta Stone of rock’n'roll. 

Suddenly I understood the true meaning of the old saying about how the Velvets didn’t sell a whole lot of  albums during their brief existence but everyone who bought a copy went out and formed a band.

Lead singer Lou Reed‘s vocals were sly and insinuating, with a subtle edge that seemed to say, “Sure, you can enter our world  but you’d better be streetsmart and worldlywise … or at least carry a weapon.”


Classic Albums

                           Nobody ever hurt so bad and made me feel so good.

This collection (which I have on vinyl, believe it or not) has deathless Hank Sr. classics like Honky Tonk Blues, I’m So Lonesome I Could Cry, Lovesick Blues and Move It On Over.

I’m savin’ this one for a soggy Saturday night when there’s no one home next door.

I’m gonna crank up the Victrola, crack open a six pack of Red Dog I’ve been saving for a special occasion and practice howlin’ at the moon.

Yee – hah! (I’ve been learning how to rebel yell phonetically from Professor Trigger at the Country and Western Arts Building down yonder.)

                                           Whew! This is hard-hitting stuff.

Rising young Mexican filmmaker Gerardo Naranjo co-wrote and directed this tale of a Mexican  beauty queen who becomes mixed up with a violent drug cartel.  

Sound far-fetched?  Then Google Laura Zuniga. 

Her real-life story was the inspiration for this fictional drama.

And while you’re at it write down the name of Stephanie Sigman for future reference.

She’s the young Mexican-born actress who plays Laura Guerrero, an innocent teen who leaves her suburban home one ill-fated morning to enter a beauty contest and ends up as a reluctant accomplice to drugs and murder when the leader of the gang (Noe Hernandez) takes a shine to her.

With her restrained and fearless performance in the title role, Ms. Sigman proves she is a force to be reckoned with. Hopefully it is only a matter of time before she joins Gael Garcia Bernal (Bad Education) and Diego Luna (Contraband) in the international spotlight. (Bernal and Luna are  listed as executive producers on the film.)

Gael Garcia Bernal and Diego Luna at 2011 Toronto International Film Festival (Luna is the one with the mic)

And save a prayer for the Mexican people.

If we accept that Ms. Sigman’s character is a metaphor for the average Mexican citizen they need all the help they can get.

Lensed with raw, you-are-there immediacy, Miss Bala plays like a riveting front line dispatch from the Mexican drug war.

And as this film makes clear, it is a war.


I first saw this 196os classic by French director Francois Truffaut  while I was a member of a university film society but I musta been too impatient and/or lacked the life experience to fully appreciate it.

When I saw it on DVD at my local library in a restored 2-disc edition from The Criterion Collection I just had to check it out again.

Oskar Werner plays  Jules. Henri Serre is Jim. The two friends are living la vie boheme in Paris in the early 1900s when they meet the elusive and free-spirited Catherine (Jeanne Moreau). 

She will eventually become romantically involved with both men.

Problem is …

Although Jules is steady, reliable and utterly devoted he lacks passion and spontaneity. Jim is passionate and impulsive but he is also romantically attached to long-suffering girlfriend Gilberte (Vanna Urbino) and  since Catherine has to be the center of attention in all her relationships her liaison with Jim fails to satisfy her complex emotional needs as well. 

The film traces the course of the trio’s relationship over a period of 25 years. Ultimately  Catherine will exercise the only option she feels is open to her.

What can I say ?

La Moreau is still a paragon of  Old World femininity ……

and after watching The Spy Who Came In from the Cold recently on DVD I wondered anew why the late Mr. Werner didn’t have a more high profile film career.

Just on the basis on those two films alone the Austrian born actor should have been able to name his price for any film in any language he chose.

The three’s-no-crowd ethos that pervades  Jules and Jim  made for provocative viewing when it was first released in America and remains controversial decades later.

Truffaut is worshipped by critics, filmmakers and knowledgeable viewers. Adopted by many latter day directors,  Truffaut’s use of camera pans, locations, freeze frames and other cinematic techniques  were both startling and inspiring  when first introduced as part of what became known as the French New Wave (or nouvelle vague).

Francois Truffaut: Have Camera Will Travel

Recent video interviews with Truffaut’s long time cinematographer  Raoul Coutard and screenwriter Jean Grualt shed light on the master’s creative process. However, the extras I like the most are the clips featuring Truffaut himself. The Criterion folks have unearthed clips from 1960s interviews on French TV  in which Truffaut talks about shooting Jules and Jim, working with La Moreau and his passion for Hitchcock films. (Truffaut conducted a book-length interview with the famed British director.)  These (subtitled) interviews are personal, relaxed and intimate.

Truffaut’s Art Loses Nothing In the Translation

There is also a Q & A session from an American program in which Truffaut, speaking through a translator, explains (among other things) why he doesn’t feel the need to rehearse a scene before committing it to film.

Truffaut comes across as affable, warm and softspoken but I could sense a restless intelligence just behind the eyes, sparking with ideas and new ways to express them cinematically.  Film-making was truly his raison d’etre. And it shows in these well chosen clips.

Helen Hessel: The Real Catherine?

One thing I didn’t know before viewing the Criterion set  is that Jules and Jim is based on an autobiographical novel by Henri-Pierre Roche. A prominent member of the French arts community during the early years of  the last century Roche was best friends with German scholar Franz Hessell and more than best friends with his wife Helen.The three principals of the relationship are long gone but Helen’s sons are still alive and in excerpts from the 1985 documentary The Key to Jules and Jim they talk about their mother and her unusual relationships with great fondness.

It is this attention to detail (as well as the impeccable restoration jobs that breathe vibrant new life into old films) that has endeared Criterion to gourmet film fans.

The Criterion website hails Jules and Jim as “one of the finest films ever made.”  And if you still don’t know why after viewing the film and all the bonus features there is a 44 page booklet including, among other things, an essay by  film critic John Powers.

However, I still maintain that enjoying a classic film is like listening to a piece of good  jazz. One does not need to know all the intricacies of rhythm, pacing and technique to appreciate it: the important thing is making an emotional connection with the piece.

And with its themes of love, friendship, anger and disappointment, Jules and Jim  is all about emotion, acted with charm and finesse by a wonderful cast and lensed with a kind of visual poetry by a master filmmaker.






DEBORAH ANN WOLL: “You’re just my type. Blood type, that is.”

I’ll be honest with you. I don’t have the psychological metabolism it takes to be a horror movie buff. For one thing,  I don’t need to go to a movie to be shocked out of my gourd. Real life can be unnerving enough. Even as a kid I had a healthy respect for the supernatural.

So why do I watch horror flicks?  Well, for one thing, I don’t want to embarrass myself in front of my gorehound nephew. (Good thing I am only able to visit once or twice a year or I would have to sleep with the nite lite on all the time.)

And I am inextricably drawn to vampire flicks (and TV shows) with a vein of dark humor.

I mean, there’s a certain art to saying lines like the ones below with a completely straight face as if it was the most normal thing in one’s life.

***********************************************************************

Oh, I love you too, Hoyt! Now drink my blood!”

Deborah Ann Woll in the role of teen vamp Jessica Hamby makes Jim Parrack  (as Jessica’s persistent paramour Hoyt Fortenberry)  an offer he can’t refuse. Apparently Hoyt has been badly injured (don’t ask) and vampire blood has miraculous healing properties.

********************************************************************

And from the same cable TV hit … 

Talbot (Theo Alexander) scolds master vampire Russell (Denis O’Hare): “You’re acting like a century old child.”

Denis O’Hare (seated) and Theo Alexander in scene from “True Blood”

(Actually, Russell is 3000 years old but he doesn’t look a day under 2,290)

********************************************************************

From Fright Night (the 2011 remake)

Ed (Christopher Mintz-Plasse): ” I really hate to be the one to tell you this but your neighbour is a vampire.”

Charley (Anton Yelchin) : “Jerry? I just met him.”

Ed: “Okay. Jerry.

Charley: That is a terrible vampire name.  Jerry?” 

(l. to r.) Anton Yelchin and Christopher Mintz-Plasse in “Fright Night” (2011)

***************************************************************************

From Daybreakers (2009)

Frankie (Michael Dorman)  “This is some birthday party, bro.”

Edward (Ethan Hawke )  “Yeah, well, I’ve turned 35 ten times.”

Ethan Hawke in “Daybreakers”

************************************************************************

From The Vampire Diaries (TV series)

Damon (Ian Somerhalder): “Elena know you’re drinking blood?
Stefan (Paul Wesley): “I’ve been drinking hers.
Damon: “Hmm… how romantic.”

Damon and Stefan Get Their Shirt Together on “Vampire Diaries”

****************************************************************************

From Blade (1998)

Quinn (Donal Logue): “I’m gonna be naughty! I’m going to be a naughty vampire god!”

Naughty Not Nice: Donal Logue as Quinn in “Blade”

****************************************************************************

From Dusk Till Dawn (1996)

Kate (Juliette Lewis): “Are you okay?”

Seth (George Clooney): “Peachy, Kate. The world’s my oyster, except for the fact that I just rammed a wooden stake in my brother’s heart ….

“From Dusk To Dawn” (roughly translated)

*****************************************************************************

Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series)

Drusilla (Juliet Landau): How do you feel about eternal life?
Xander (Nicholas Brendon): We couldn’t just start with a coffee?

Juliet Landau practices her pick-up lines in “Buffy the Vampire Slayer”

*****************************************************************************

Lost Boys: The Tribe (2008 direct to DVD movie)

Nicole (Autumn Reeser):  Do you know what it’s like for me to want to drink blood? Do you know how disgusting that is? I’m a vegetarian!

Autumn Reeser in “Lost Boys:The Tribe”: Fangs for the Memories

****************************************************************************
From Let The Right One In (Lat den ratte komma in) 2008 
Eli (Lina Leandersson): “I’m twelve but I’ve been twelve for a very long time.”
Lina Leandersson in “Let the Right One In”
***************************************************************************


With her husband Gerry Goffin and others Carole King co-wrote timeless pop classics like  “ Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow and  (You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman   and co-wrote and recorded the 1971 LP Tapestry which went on to become one of the biggest selling albums of all time (20 million copies and counting)

Recently she wrote a memoir called A Natural Woman which, among other things, sheds a personal insight into her creative process ….

 “  Craft is when you sit in front of a blank page, a musical instrument or a computer screen, and wonder how you`re going to come up with a second verse, the next chapter, an irrefutable argument in a legal brief, or that certain-to-get-you-admitted paragraph in a college essay … When I hit a wall I usually stop and do something else. This effectively turns the problem over to my subconscious mind, which keeps working on it under the radar. When I return to my task, my subconscious has often solved the problem before my ego has time to assert control. When the ego is in charge, that`s when the work is coming  from you. You may still be doing good work but the ego allows doubt to creep in …. when the thing you`re creating comes through you, you know it ….

Carole King Today: 68 and Lookin`Great!


.

Okay, I realize the quotes below are from an article included in a collection of  Tom Wolfe essays published a decade ago.

However, the comment headlining this post may be just as true today as it was when the book was first published in 2002.  (As always it is up to the individual reader to decide.)

“Nothing in all the motion-picture arts puts you inside the head, the skin, the central nervous system of another human being the way a realistic novel can … they have tried everything, from the use of a voiceover that speaks a character’s thoughts, to subtitles that write them out, to the aside, in which the actor turns towards the camera in the midst of a scene and simply says what’s he’s thinking …. nothing works.”

Three movies have been made from things Wolfe has written (The Last American Hero, The Right Stuff, Bonfire of the Vanities) and in each case the author was struck by “how helpless perfectly talented people were when it came time to explain … anything … whether it be the mechanics and aerodynamics of a rocket-assisted airplane or the ins and outs of racial politics in the Bronx.”

“When a moviegoer comes away saying,’It wasn’t nearly as good as the novel’ it is almost always because the movie  …. failed to make him feel that he was inside the minds of the characters, failed to make him comprehend and feel the status pressures the novel has dealt with,  failed to explain that and other complex matters the book has been able to illuminate without a moment’s sacrifice of action or suspense … “ 

Excerpted from “My Three Stooges”, included in the author’s 2002 compilation book Hooking Up (Farrar, Strauss & Giroux)

Agree or disagree? It’s your dime (adjusted for inflation)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 244 other followers